Volume 33 Issue 5
Sep.  2012
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Jie-Jun, CHEN Xiao-Ming, WANG Zi-Li, YE Shou-De, CHEN Yong, WANG Shao-Yun. Ultrastructure of Ericerus pela (Chavannes) nymph mouthparts and ecological adaptations. Zoological Research, 2012, 33(5): 447-454. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.05447
Citation: ZHAO Jie-Jun, CHEN Xiao-Ming, WANG Zi-Li, YE Shou-De, CHEN Yong, WANG Shao-Yun. Ultrastructure of Ericerus pela (Chavannes) nymph mouthparts and ecological adaptations. Zoological Research, 2012, 33(5): 447-454. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.05447

Ultrastructure of Ericerus pela (Chavannes) nymph mouthparts and ecological adaptations

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.05447
  • Received Date: 2012-05-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-06-10
  • Publish Date: 2012-10-10
  • The ultrastructure of nymph mouthparts of the Chinese white wax scale (CWWS), Ericerus pela, consists internally of the crumena, tentorium, the stylet bundle, comprised of two mandibular stylets and two maxillary stylets, and the external clypeolabral shield, labium and sensilla. The mouthpart morphology and structures of the female nymphs are similar to the male. The mouthparts of CWWS have significantly different features in comparison to aphids and other coccids. First, the mouthparts of CWWS have a crumena and a developed tentorium. Second, the labrum is highly degraded and the labium is short and one-segmented. Third, the maxillary stylets have two ‘T’ type locks. Lastly, the hairs of the mouthpart are sparse and the sensilla are simple. As the labrum and labium of CWWS displayed a high degree of degradation and the tentorium was found to be highly developed, the stretching of the stylet bundle was considered to be controlled by the tentorium and crumena together. Furthermore, the degraded sensilla may be related to a specialization of feeding behavior. There were no significant differences in the length and diameter of the stylet bundles between the female and male. However, the length and diameter of the stylet bundles were significantly different between the first instar nymphs and the second instar nymphs. The first instar nymphs had stylet fascicles that were shorter and soft and initially lived on the leaves of the host trees, presumably because the leaves were thinner and they were able to pierce the leaves while the stylet bundle was relatively soft. However, the second instar nymphs had stylet bundles that were relatively hard. After the numphs molted, the degree of ossification of the stylet bundles was enhanced (increased) and the nymphs returned to the branches for living, where the strengthened stylet bundles may provide a better adaption for the thicker bark. All told, the first and second stage instar CWWS nymphs switched from leaves to the branches in order to find a safe habitat and stable food source.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Adams JB, Fyfe FW. 1970. Stereoscan views of some aphid mouthparts [J]. Can J Zool, 48: 1033-1034.
    [2]
    Beardsley JWJ, Gonzalez RH. 1975. The biology and ecology of armored scales [J]. Annu Rev Entomol, 20:47-73.
    [3]
    Ben-Dov Y. 2006. A systematic catalogue of eight Scale Insect families (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of the world Aclerdidae, Asterolecaniidae, Beesoniidae, Carayonemidae, Conchaspididae, Dactylopiidae, Kerriidae and Lecanodiaspididae [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1-368.
    [4]
    Brozek J. 2006. Internal structures of the mouthparts of Coccinea(Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) [J]. Pol Pismo Entomol, 75(2): 255-265.
    [5]
    Chen XM. 2011. Natural population ecology of Ericerus pela [M]. Beijing: Science press, 1-136. [陈晓鸣. 2011. 白蜡虫自然种群生态学 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1-136.]
    [6]
    Chen XM, Ye SD, Chen Y, Mao YF, Wang ZL, Wang SY. 1997 Studies on distribution characteristics of Chinese white wax scale(Ericerus pela Chavannes) on host plant. Forest Res, 10(4): 415-419. 陈晓鸣, 叶寿德, 陈勇, 毛玉芬, 王自力, 王绍云. 1997 白蜡虫在寄主植物上的分布特征研究 [J]. 林业科学研究, 10(4): 415-419.]
    [7]
    De Lotto G. 1971. On some genera and species of wax scales (Homoptera: Coccidae) [J]. J Nat Hist, 5(2): 133-153.
    [8]
    Dixon AFG. 2005. Insect Herbivore–Host Dynamics: Tree-Dwelling Aphids [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 18-42.
    [9]
    Ferris GF. 1950. Report upon scale insects collected in China (Homoptera: Cocoidea). Part II [J]. Microent, 15(3): 69-97.
    [10]
    Foldi I. 1997. Defense strategies in scale insects: phylogenetic inference and evolutionary scenarios (Hemiptera: Coccoidea). In Grandcolas P (ed.), The origin of biodiversity in insects: phylogenetic tests of evolutionary scenarios [M]. Paris: Memoires Musee National Histoire Naturelle, 203-230.
    [11]
    Forbes AR. 1966. Electron microscope evidence for nerves in the mandibular stylets of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) [j]. Nature, 212: 726.
    [12]
    Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M. 1997. Adaptations in scale insects [J]. Annu Rev Entomol, 42: 23-50.
    [13]
    Heriot AD. 1934. The renewal and replacement of the stylets of sucking insects during each stadium, and the method of penetration [J]. Can J Res, 11(5): 602-612.
    [14]
    Koteja J. 1974. On the phylogeny and classification of the scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea)(discussion based on the morphology of the mouthparts) [J]. Acta Zool Cracov, 19: 267-325.
    [15]
    Koteja J. 1985. Essay on the prehistory of the scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea) [J]. Ann Zool (Warsaw), 38: 321–328.
    [16]
    Kuwana I. 1923. The Chinese white-wax scale, Ericerus pela Chavannes [J]. Philippine J Sci, 22(4): 393-405.
    [17]
    Le Rü B, Renard S, Allo MR, Le LJ, Rolland JP. 1995. Morphology and ultrastructure of sensory receptors of the labium of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) [J]. Entomol Exp Appl, 77(1): 31-36.
    [18]
    Leopold RA, Freeman TP, Buckner JS, Nelson DR. 2003. Mouthpart morphology and stylet penetration of host plants by the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata(Homoptera: Cicadellidae) [J]. Arthropod Struct Dev, 32(2-3): 189-199.
    [19]
    Miles PW. 1968. Insect secretions in plants [J]. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 6: 137-164.
    [20]
    Miles PW. 1972. The saliva of Hemiptera [J]. Adv Insect Physiol, 9: 183-255.
    [21]
    Miles PW. 1999. Aphid saliva [J]. Biol Rev, 74(1): 41–85.
    [22]
    Pesson P. 1944. Contribution à l'étude morphologique et fonctionnelle de la tête, de l'appareil buccal et du tube digestif des femelles de coccides [M]. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1-260.
    [23]
    Pollard DG. 1973. Plant penetration by feeding aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea): a review [J]. Bull Entomol Res, 62(4): 631-714.
    [24]
    Powell G, Tosh CR, Hardie J. 2006. Host plant selection by Aphids: Behavioral, Evolutionary and Applied Perspectives [J]. Annu Rev Entomol, 51: 309-330.
    [25]
    Rani PU, Madhavendra SS. 2005. External morphology of antennal and rostral sensillae in four hemipteran insects and their possible role in host plant selection [J]. Int J Trop Insect Sci, 25(3): 198-207.
    [26]
    Rosell RC, Lichty JE, Brown JJ. 1995. Ultrastructure of the mouthparts of adult sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) [J]. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol, 24(3): 297-306.
    [27]
    Sasaki C. 1904. On the wax-producing coccid, Ericerus pe-la, Westwood [M]. The bulletin of the College of Agriculture, Tokyo Imperial University, 6:1-14.
    [28]
    Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-plant biology(Second Edition) [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-47.
    [29]
    Snodgrass RE. 1935. Principles of insect morphology [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 265-277.
    [30]
    Speight M, Nicol M. 1984. Horse chestnut scale - a new urban menace? [J]. New Sci, 101(1404): 40-42.
    [31]
    Tjallingii WF. 1978. Mechanoreceptors of the aphid labium [J]. Entomol Exp Appl, 24(3): 731–737.
    [32]
    Uzest M, Gargani D, Dombrovsky A, Cazevieille C, Cot D, Blanc S. 2010. The "acrostyle": A newly described anatomical structure in aphid stylets [J]. Arthropod Struct Dev, 39:221-229.
    [33]
    Walling LL. 2008. Avoiding effective defenses: strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects [J]. Plant Physiol, 146(3): 859–866.
    [34]
    Wang ZL, Chen Y, Chen XM, Wang SY, Zhao JJ. 2008. Color preference and active regularity of the parasite wasps of Ericerus pela. Acta [J]. Zool Res, 29(6): 661-666. [王自力, 陈勇, 陈晓鸣, 王绍云, 赵杰军. 2008. 白蜡虫寄生蜂对颜色的选择性及活动规律 [J]. 动物学研究, 29(6): 661-666.]
    [35]
    Wensler RJ. 1977. The Fine Structure of Distal Receptors on the Labium of the Aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L. (Homoptera): Implications for Current Theories of Sensory Transduction [J]. Cell Tissue Res, 181(3): 409-422.
    [36]
    Yano M. 1915. White wax coccid (Ericerus pela CHAV.) [M]. Bulletin of forest experiment station, Meguro, Tokyo, 143-150.Zhao LQ, Dai W, Zhang CN, Zhang YL. 2010. Morphological characterization of the mouthparts of the vector leafhopper Psammotettix striatus (L.) (Hemiptera:Cicadellidae) [J]. Micron, 41(7): 754-759.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2164) PDF downloads(1852) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return