Volume 42 Issue 3
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhi-Ning Wang, Li Yang, Peng-Fei Fan, Lu Zhang. Species bias and spillover effects in scientific research on Carnivora in China. Zoological Research, 2021, 42(3): 354-361. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.033
Citation: Zhi-Ning Wang, Li Yang, Peng-Fei Fan, Lu Zhang. Species bias and spillover effects in scientific research on Carnivora in China. Zoological Research, 2021, 42(3): 354-361. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.033

Species bias and spillover effects in scientific research on Carnivora in China

doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.033
Funds:  This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900372, 31822049)
More Information
  • Scientific research provides essential information for conservation of threatened species. Data deficiency due to insufficient research impedes the design of conservation plans, and research bias may mistakenly direct limited resources to low biodiversity regions or less threatened species. Here, we conducted a systematic review of published papers, grants, and graduate student training on carnivorans in China to identify species bias and research gaps. Furthermore, we collected intrinsic and extrinsic features of carnivorans, and identified features that impact research intensity using generalized linear models. We found that the amount of research on carnivorans increased markedly after 2000, but species bias existed. Bears and big cats received the greatest research attention, while most small- and medium-sized carnivorans received little attention, thus showing the 80-20 phenomenon. Species with a higher level of endemism and protection under Chinese law received more consideration. As an animal conservation icon in China, the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) attracted more than 50% of overall carnivoran research resources. However, the giant panda also showed spillover effects, i.e., post-doctoral graduates who studied the giant panda shifted their research focus to other species after graduation, which may help improve research on other species. Thus, to improve and strengthen Carnivora research and conservation, we suggest investing greater effort in species of less concern, training of more graduate students, and reinforcing academic exchange. If such actions are not taken, many carnivoran species will continue being data deficient and threatened.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Arponen A. 2012. Prioritizing species for conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(4): 875−893. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0242-1
    Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S, Wogan GOU, Swartz B, Quental TB, et al. 2011. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature, 471(7336): 51−57. doi: 10.1038/nature09678
    Brito D. 2008. Amphibian conservation: are we on the right track?. Biological Conservation, 141(11): 2912−2917. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.016
    Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP. 2011. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1): 23−35. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
    Cardillo M, Purvis A, Sechrest W, Gittleman JL, Bielby J, Mace GM. 2004. Human population density and extinction risk in the world's carnivores. PLoS Biology, 2(7): e197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197
    CBD. 2010. The strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the aichi biodiversity targets. Nagoya, Japan.
    Christie AP, Amano T, Martin PA, Petrovan SO, Shackelford GE, Simmons BI, et al. 2021. The challenge of biased evidence in conservation. Conservation Biology, 35(1): 249−262. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13577
    Clark JA, May RM. 2002. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science, 297(5579): 191−192.
    Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, et al. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science, 333(6040): 301−306. doi: 10.1126/science.1205106
    Estes JA, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Doak DF. 1998. Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282(5388): 473−476. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5388.473
    Fan PF, Ma C. 2018. Extant primates and development of primatology in China: publications, student training, and funding. Zoological Research, 39(4): 249−254. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.033
    Fan PF, Yang L, Liu Y, Lee TM. 2020. Build up conservation research capacity in China for biodiversity governance. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(9): 1162−1167.
    Ford AT, Cooke SJ, Goheen JR, Young TP. 2017. Conserving megafauna or sacrificing biodiversity?. BioScience, 67(3): 193−196.
    Gillespie CS. 2015. Fitting heavy tailed distributions: the powerlaw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(2): 1−16.
    Gumbs R, Gray CL, Wearn OR, Owen NR. 2018. Tetrapods on the EDGE: overcoming data limitations to identify phylogenetic conservation priorities. PLoS One, 13(4): e0194680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194680
    Hammerschlag N, Gallagher AJ. 2017. Extinction risk and conservation of the earth's national animal symbols. BioScience, 67(8): 744−749. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix054
    He L, García-Perea R, Li M, Wei FW. 2004. Distribution and conservation status of the endemic Chinese mountain cat Felis bieti. Oryx, 38(1): 55−61.
    Horta H, Veloso FM, Grediaga R. 2010. Navel gazing: academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3): 414−429. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109
    Hu YB, Wu Q, Ma S, Ma TX, Shan L, Wang X, et al. 2017. Comparative genomics reveals convergent evolution between the bamboo-eating giant and red pandas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(5): 1081−1086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613870114
    Hu YS, Luo ZH, Chapman CA, Pimm SL, Turvey ST, Lawes MJ, et al. 2019. Regional scientific research benefits threatened-species conservation. National Science Review, 6(6): 1076−1079. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz090
    Jiang ZG, Liu SY, Wu Y, Jiang XL, Zhou KY. 2017. Chian's mammal diversity (2nd edition). Biodiversity Science, 25(8): 886−895. (in Chinese) doi: 10.17520/biods.2017098
    Kruuk H. 2006. Otters: Ecology, Behaviour, and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Lau MWN, Fellowes JR, Chan BPL. 2010. Carnivores (Mammalia: Carnivora) in South China: a status review with notes on the commercial trade. Mammal Review, 40(4): 247−292. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00163.x
    Li S, McShea WJ, Wang DJ, Gu XD, Zhang XF, Zhang L, et al. 2020. Retreat of large carnivores across the giant panda distribution range. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(10): 1327−1331.
    Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, AkÇakaya HR, Leader-Williams N, et al. 2008. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conservation Biology, 22(6): 1424−1442. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x
    Mace GM, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. 2003. Preserving the tree of life. Science, 300(5626): 1707−1709. doi: 10.1126/science.1085510
    Marginson S. 2018. National/global synergy in the development of higher education and science in China since 1978. Frontiers of Education in China, 13(4): 486−512. doi: 10.1007/s11516-018-0027-8
    Miller B, Dugelby B, Foreman D, del Río CM, Noss R, Phillips M, et al. 2001. The importance of large carnivores to healthy ecosystems. Endangered Species Update, 18(5): 202−210.
    Newman MEJ. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5): 323−351. doi: 10.1080/00107510500052444
    Nie YG, Speakman JR, Wu Q, Zhang CL, Hu YB, Xia MH, et al. 2015. Exceptionally low daily energy expenditure in the bamboo-eating giant panda. Science, 349(6244): 171−174. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2413
    Nie YG, Wei FW, Zhou WL, Hu YB, Senior AM, Wu Q, et al. 2019. Giant pandas are macronutritional carnivores. Current Biology, 29(10): 1677−1682. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.067
    Papeş M, Gaubert P. 2007. Modelling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences: assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents. Diversity and Distributions, 13(6): 890−902. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00392.x
    Prugh LR, Stoner CJ, Epps CW, Bean WT, Ripple WJ, Laliberte AS, et al. 2009. The rise of the mesopredator. BioScience, 59(9): 779−791. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.9
    R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R for Statistical Computing.
    Swaisgood RR, Wang DJ, Wei FW. 2018. Panda downlisted but not out of the woods. Conservation Letters, 11(1): e12355. doi: 10.1111/conl.12355
    Symonds MRE, Moussalli A. 2011. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1): 13−21. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1037-6
    Tensen L. 2018. Biases in wildlife and conservation research, using felids and canids as a case study. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15: e00423. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00423
    Upham NS, Esselstyn JA, Jetz W. 2019. Inferring the mammal tree: species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biology, 17(12): e3000494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494
    Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S. 2004. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1): 192−196.
    Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA. 2009. Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 1. Carnivores. Barcelona: Lynx.
    Wilson KA, Auerbach NA, Sam K, Magini AG, Moss ASL, Langhans SD, et al. 2016. Conservation research is not happening where it is most needed. PLoS Biology, 14(3): e1002413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002413
    Xiao LG, Zhao RQ. 2017. China's new era of ecological civilization. Science, 358(6366): 1008−1009.
    Yu GC, Smith DK, Zhu HC, Guan Y, Lam TTY. 2017. Ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(1): 28−36. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12628
    Zhang L, Wang QY, Yang L, Li F, Chan BPL, Xiao ZS, et al. 2018. The neglected otters in China: distribution change in the past 400 years and current conservation status. Biological Conservation, 228: 259−267. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.028
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1207) PDF downloads(187) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint