Volume 34 Issue 3
May  2013
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Fang ZHANG, Pan CHEN, Shu-Yi ZHAO. Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments. Zoological Research, 2013, 34(3): 196-203. doi: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.3.0196
Citation: Fang ZHANG, Pan CHEN, Shu-Yi ZHAO. Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments. Zoological Research, 2013, 34(3): 196-203. doi: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.3.0196

Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments

doi: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.3.0196
  • Received Date: 2012-12-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-02-21
  • Publish Date: 2013-06-08
  • In order to understand the acoustic characteristics and adaptive strategies of sympatric male Amolops wuyiensis and male Odorrana tormotus in environments controlled for high noise levels, we recorded and analyzed the advertisement calls produced by individual males during breeding season. The results show that A. wuyiensis produced a single type of call composed of variable syllables (from 3 to 6 syllables) with 2~10 pulses over different time periods. The average values of call duration, dominant frequency and signal noise ratio were 2 198.20 ms, 2 231.90 Hz and 33.00 dB respectively. There were no ultrasonic elements in A. wuyiensis calls and they did not have the basis of ultrasonic communication. The average values of call duration, dominant frequency and signal noise ratio of O. tormotus were 331.80 ms, 6 665.50 Hz and 37.00 dB respectively. Call structure of O. tormotus was consistent with previous studies. The noise did not mask the calls from the male A. wuyiensis and male O. tormotus, which have higher frequencies and amplitudes. To fulfill the intra-species communication in a noise-controlled environment, the A. wuyiensis male, which has a low vocal frequency and long transmission length, varied vocal frequency, composition, and duration, the latter of which serves to attract females. By contrast, the male O. tormotus increased vocal frequency, which reduces the energy expended on intra-species communication.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Arch VS, Grafe TU, Narins PM. 2008. Ultrasonic signaling by a Bornean frog. Biology Letters, 4(1): 19-22.
    Arch VS, Richards-Zawaki CL, Feng AS. 2011. Acoustic communication in the Kihansi spray toad (Nectophrynoides asperginis): Insights from a captive population. Journal of Herpetology, 45(1): 45-49.
    Arch VS, Grafe TU, Gridi-Papp M, Narins PM. 2009. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog. PLoS ONE, 4(4): 5413-5420.
    Bee MA. 2004. Within-individual variation in bullfrog vocalizations: Implication for a vocally mediated social recognition system. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 116(6): 3770-3781.
    Bee MA, Micheyl C. 2008. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122(3): 235-251.
    Brumm H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(3): 434-440.
    Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35: 151-209.
    Castellano S, Giacoma C. 1998. Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad. Animal Behaviour, 56(2): 275-287.
    Chen BH. 1991. Anhui Amphbia & Repetila. Hefei: Anhui Press of Sciences & Technology (in Chinese).
    Cynx J, Lewis R, Tavel B, Tse H. 1998. Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour, 56(1): 107-113.
    Feng AS, Narins PM, Xu CH. 2002. Vocal acrobatics in a Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus. Naturwissenschaften, 89(8): 352-356.
    Feng AS, Riede T, Arch VS, Yu ZL, Xu ZM, Yu XJ, Shen JX. 2009. Diversity of the vocal signals of concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota): Evidence for individual signatures. Ethology, 115(11): 1015-1028.
    Feng AS, Narins PM, Xu CH, Lin WY, Yu ZL, Qiu Q, Xu ZM, Shen JX. 2006. Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature, 440(7082): 333-336.
    Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H. 2009. A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Animal Behaviour, 78(6): 1301-1307.
    Howard RD, Young JR. 1998. Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Animal Behaviour, 55(5): 1165-1167.
    Jiang JP, Xie F, Fei L, Ye CY, Zheng M. 2002. Mating calls of six forms of pleobatid in Wa Wu Mountain National Forest Park, Sichuan, China (Anura: Pelobatidae). Zoological Research, 23(1): 89-94.
    Langemann U, Gauger B, Klump GM. 1998. Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise. Animal Behaviour, 56(3): 763-769.
    Lengagne T, Aubin T, Lauga J, Jouventin P. 1999. How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communication in windy conditions? Proceedings of the Royal Society, 266(1429): 1623-1628.
    Nevo E, Schneider H. 1976. Mating call pattern of green toads in Israel and its ecological correlate. Journal of Zoology, 178(1): 133-145.
    Parris KM. 2002. More bang for your buck: the effect of caller position, habitat and chorus noise on the efficiency of calling in the spring peeper. Ecological Modelling, 156(2): 213-224.
    Parris KM, Velik-Lord M, North JMA. 2009. Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecology and Society, 14(1): 25.
    Potash LM. 1972. Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychonomic Science, 26(1): 252-254.
    Ryan MJ. 1985. The Tangara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 230 pp.
    Ryan MJ. 2001. Feature weighting in signal recognition and discrim ination in tuńgara frogs. In: Ryan MJ, ed. Anuran Communication. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution, 86-101.
    Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematic Theory of Communication. Urbana: Illinois University Press.
    Shen JX. 2006. Novel progress on acoustic communication in the concave-eared torrent frog and its revelation. Science Foundation in China, 20(6): 321-322. (in Chinese)
    Shen JX, Feng AS, Xu ZM, Yu ZL, Arch VS, Yu XJ, Narins PM. 2008. Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature, 453(7197): 914-916.
    Slabbekoorn H, Peet M. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424(6946): 267.
    Sullivan BK, Wagner WEW Jr. 1988. Variation in advertisement and release calls, and social influences on calling behavior in the Gulf Coast toad (Bufo valliceps). Copeia, 1988(4): 1014-1020.
    Sullivan BK, Ryan MJ, Verrell P. 1995. Female choice and mating system structure// Heatwole H, Sullivan B K, eds. Amphibian Biology, Vol. 2. NSW, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons, 469-517.
    Parks SE, Johnson M, Nowacek D, Tyack PL. 2011. Individual right whales call louder in increased environmental noise. Biology Letters, 7(1): 33-35.
    Ward S, Speakman JR, Slater PJB. 2003. The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria. Animal Behaviour, 66(5): 893-902.
    Wei L, Lin ZH, Ma XM, Zhao LH, Ma XH. 2011. Acoustic characteristics of the tiger frog, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, during the breeding season.
    Zoological Research, 32(4): 456-460.
    Wells KD. 1988. The effect of social interactions on anuran vocal behavior. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan M J, WiZSzynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 433-454.
    Wells KD, Taigen TL, O’Brien J. 1996. The effect of temperature on calling energetics of the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer). Amphibia-Reptilia, 17(2): 149-58.
    Yu BG, Zheng RQ. 2009. The advertisement call of the giant spiny frog Paa spinosa. Current Zoology, 55(6): 411-415.
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1142) PDF downloads(1682) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint