• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
滕丽微, 刘振生, 张恩迪, 马建章, . 2006: 黑龙江省三江自然保护区狍对冬季卧息地的选择. 动物学研究, 27(4): 403-410.
引用本文: 滕丽微, 刘振生, 张恩迪, 马建章, . 2006: 黑龙江省三江自然保护区狍对冬季卧息地的选择. 动物学研究, 27(4): 403-410.
TENG Li-wei, LIU Zhen-sheng, ZHANG En-di, MA Jian-zhang , *. 2006. Winter Bedding Site Selection by the Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province, China. Zoological Research, 27(4): 403-410.
Citation: TENG Li-wei, LIU Zhen-sheng, ZHANG En-di, MA Jian-zhang , *. 2006. Winter Bedding Site Selection by the Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province, China. Zoological Research, 27(4): 403-410.

黑龙江省三江自然保护区狍对冬季卧息地的选择

Winter Bedding Site Selection by the Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province, China

  • 摘要: 研究黑龙江三江自然保护区狍冬季卧息地的选择性结果表明,狍昼间偏好选择位于岛状林和芦苇丛、覆盖度>10%、当年生枝条数>30枝、隐蔽级90%—99%、距水源距离<400 m、距农田距离<500 m、保温性>0.2 ℃、雪深>31 cm、人为干扰距离>1 000 m等生境因子的卧息地;狍夜间偏好选择位于岛状林、覆盖度>10%、当年生枝条数>30枝、隐蔽级为<90%、距水源距离<700 m、距农田距离>500 m、保温性>0.2 ℃、雪深>31 cm、人为干扰距离>1 000 m等生境因子的卧息地。狍昼间与夜间卧息地在是否刨走积雪等松软物质、距农田距离、雪深、人为干扰距离和卧息地宽度上差异显著(P<0.05)。与夜间卧息地相比,狍昼间偏爱的卧息地具有接近农田、雪覆盖深和卧息地宽度较小等特征。狍对昼间卧息地资源选择函数为:log it(P)=-13.999-0.446×植被类型-0.003×距水源距离-0.003×距农田距离+0.915×保温性+0.487×雪深+0.001×人为干扰距离,选择概率为P=e logit(P)/1+e log it(P) ,模型的正确预测率为90.9%;狍对夜间卧息地资源选择函数为:logit(P)=-0.009-1.863×植被类型-0.004×距水源距离+0.946×保温性+0.002×人为干扰距离,选择概率为P=elogit(P)/1+e logit(P) ,模型的正确预测率为91.8%。

     

    Abstract: Winter bedding sites used by the roe deer Capreolus capreolus were studied using a resource selection function in the wetland of Sanjinag National Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province, from January to March 1999. Site characteristics were measured at the bedding sites and control sites. Roe deer selected diurnal bedding sites with island forest and clumps of reeds, denser canopy closure (>10%), higher numbers of new shoots (>30 individuals), moderate hiding cover (90%-99%), closer to water resources (<400 m), closer to croplands (<500 m), higher temperate index (>0.2 ℃), deeper snow (>31 cm) and farther from human disturbance (>1 000 m). At night, roe deer preferred bedding below island forests, denser canopy closure (>10%), higher numbers of new shoots (>30 individuals), mild hiding cover (<90%), moderate distance from water resources (<700 m), farther from croplands (>500 m), higher temperate index (>0.2 ℃) and farther from human disturbance (>1 000 m). Roe deer showed significant differences in use of scraped beds by deer, distance from cropland, snow depth, distance from human disturbance and width of beds between day and night. Day beds were associated with closer proximity to cropland, deeper snow and were narrower than night beds. The resource selection function of day beds used by roe deer is a logistical regression model: logit(P)=-13.999-0.446×vegetation type-0.003×distance from water resource-0.003×distance from cropland+0.915×temperate index+0.487×snow depth+0.001×distance from human disturbance. The selection probability is therefore: P=e logit(P)/1+e logit(P) . The model correctly classified 90.9% of day bed sites. The resource selection function of night beds by roe deer is: log it(P)=-0.009-1.863×vegetation type-0.004×distance from water resource+0.946×temperate index+0.002×distance from human disturbance. We can estimate the selection probability from this model: P=elogit(P)/1+e logit(P) . This model correctly classified 91.8% of night bed sites.

     

/

返回文章
返回