• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
龚世平, 史海涛, 谢才坚, 陈川, 徐汝梅. 2005: 海南岛黎母山四眼斑水龟对春季生境的选择性. 动物学研究, 26(2): 142-146.
引用本文: 龚世平, 史海涛, 谢才坚, 陈川, 徐汝梅. 2005: 海南岛黎母山四眼斑水龟对春季生境的选择性. 动物学研究, 26(2): 142-146.
GONG Shi-ping, SHI Hai-tao, XIE Cai-jian, CHEN Chuan, XU Ru-mei. 2005. Spring Habitat Selection by Four Eyespotted Turtle (Sacalia quadriocellata) in Limu Mountain of Hainan Island. Zoological Research, 26(2): 142-146.
Citation: GONG Shi-ping, SHI Hai-tao, XIE Cai-jian, CHEN Chuan, XU Ru-mei. 2005. Spring Habitat Selection by Four Eyespotted Turtle (Sacalia quadriocellata) in Limu Mountain of Hainan Island. Zoological Research, 26(2): 142-146.

海南岛黎母山四眼斑水龟对春季生境的选择性

Spring Habitat Selection by Four Eyespotted Turtle (Sacalia quadriocellata) in Limu Mountain of Hainan Island

  • 摘要: 2004年3—4月,在海南岛黎母山采用系统抽样法对四眼斑水龟春季生境选择进行了初步研究。在海拔170~1 170 m设196个研究样点,共1 392个笼捕日。其中在海拔170~470 m的26个布笼点共捕获四眼斑水龟36只,而在海拔470~1 170 m未捕获到四眼斑水龟。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,对海拔500 m以下四眼斑水龟利用样地(n=26)和海拔500 m以上的对照样地(n=26)的生态因子差异显著性进行检验。结果表明,两类样地的海拔、植被类型、植被盖度、落叶厚度、土壤类型、坡度、水面宽、水深、水面流速、基底类型、露石率、食物丰度、干扰距离13个生态因子差异均显著,仅石洞数目差异不显著。说明海拔500 m以上和以下的环境差异较大。主成分分析结果表明,影响四眼斑水龟生境选择的主要生态因子依次为:海拔、干扰距离、植被盖度、土壤类型、水深和落叶厚度。而植被类型、食物丰度、露石率、基底、石洞数目、坡度、水面宽和水面流速8个生态因子的影响不明显。保护好近河岸植被和提高当地群众对龟类的保护意识对四眼斑水龟的保护十分重要。

     

    Abstract: Spring habitat selection by four eyespotted turtle (Sacalia quadriocellata) was studied from March to April 2004 in Limu Mountain of Hainan Island which geographically locates in 19°07′-19°14′N, 109°39′-109°49′E. Using regular sampling, elevation ranging from 170 to 1 170 m, a total of 196 representative plots were sampled in the mountain stream and the distance between every two adjacent plots was 60-90 m. At every selected plot, a bamboo cage with rotten beef as bait was placed for six days to catch turtles. Fourteen ecological factors (including width of water, depth of water, speed of flow water, substrate types, percentage of exposed stones, food abundance, vegetation types, coverage, thickness of deciduous leaves, elevation, slope degree, soil types, number of stone caves, distance to human disturbance) were measured at every plot. A total of 36 S. quadriocellata were caught at 26 plots below 500 m and no S. quadriocellata was caught above 500 m. Kruskal-Wallis Test was used to analyze the difference between the usage plots (n=26) below 500 m and contrastive plots (n=26) above 500 m. Of the 14 ecological factors, only the difference in number of stone caves between usage plots and contrastive plots is insignificant. This indicates that the environment above 500 m is rather different from that below 500 m. Principal components analysis were used to analyze the important factors which affect spring habitat selection by S. quadriocellata. The result showed that six important factors were as follows in decreasing order of importance: elevation, distance to human disturbance, coverage, soil types, water depth and thickness of deciduous leaves. And the influence of vegetation types, food abundance, percentage of exposed stones, substrate types, slope degree, number of stone caves, width of water and speed of flow water on spring habitat selection by S. quadriocellata was insignificant. To protect the vegetation near riverside and to improve local peoples conservation awareness are very important for the conservation of S. quadriocellata.

     

/

返回文章
返回