Volume 33 Issue 3
May  2012
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HUANG Ya-Ling, YANG Qing, JIANG Chun, XIA Can-Wei. Two distinct parts within the song of Phoenicurus auroreus, and individual identification on the basis of the song. Zoological Research, 2012, 33(3): 249-254. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.03249
Citation: HUANG Ya-Ling, YANG Qing, JIANG Chun, XIA Can-Wei. Two distinct parts within the song of Phoenicurus auroreus, and individual identification on the basis of the song. Zoological Research, 2012, 33(3): 249-254. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.03249

Two distinct parts within the song of Phoenicurus auroreus, and individual identification on the basis of the song

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2012.03249
  • Received Date: 2011-12-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-04-06
  • Publish Date: 2012-06-22
  • Bird song has two key functions: attraction and competition. The structures of these songs have been shaped by both intra- and intersexual selection. Accordingly, there are ome species that appear to use different parts of song to attract females and repel males. Alongside this functional separation, the structure of song can also have significant divergence. We studied the songs from 32 individuals of Phoenicurus auroreus, recorded in Beijing Xiaolongmen forest Park during the 2011 breeding season. The song of Phoenicurus auroreus consists of two distinct parts, a stereotyped and variable part. Significant differences between these two parts were observed between all the variables we measured. Based on the stereotyped part, the rate of correct individual identification is satisfactory, and most of songs can be correctly classified.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility [J]. Biol J Linn Soc, 58(4): 385-399.
    Brunner P, Pasinelli G. 2010. Variation in singing style use in the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus: Influencing factors and possible functions [J]. J Avian Biol, 41(4): 388-397.
    Byers BE. 2011. Birdsong, migration and sexual selection: a skeptical view [J]. Anim Behav, 82(5): E1-E3.
    Byers BE, Kroodsma DE. 2009. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires [J]. Anim Behav, 77(1): 13-22.
    Cai QK. 1987. Birds of Beijing [M]. Beijing: Beijing Publishing. [蔡其侃. 1987. 北京鸟类志[M]. 北京: 北京出版社.]
    Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. [M]. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Collins SA, de Kort SR, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL. 2009. Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song [J]. Proc R Socy B: Biol Sci, 276(1656): 585-590.
    Delport W, Kemp AC, Ferguson JWH. 2002. Vocal identification of individual African wood owls Strix woodfordii: A technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency [J]. Ibis, 144(1): 30-39.
    Fessl B, Hoi H. 1996. The significance of a two part song in the moustached warbler (Acrocephalus melanopogon) [J]. Ethol Ecol Evol, 8(3): 265-278.
    Fox EJS. 2008. A new perspective on acoustic individual recognition in animals with limited call sharing or changing repertoires [J]. Anim Behav, 75(3): 1187-1194.
    Gilbert G, McGregor PK, Tyler G. 1994. Vocal individuality as a census tool: practical considerations illustrated by a study of 2 rare species [J]. J Field Ornithol, 65(3): 335-348.
    Gill FB. 2007. Ornithology. [M].3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
    Hartwig S. 2005. Individual acoustic identification as a non-invasive conservation tool: an approach to the
    conservation of the African wild dog Lycaon pictus (Temminck, 1820) [J]. Bioacoustics, 15(1): 35-50.
    Irwin DE. 2000. Song variation in an avian ring species [J]. Evolution, 54(3):998-1010.
    Kirschel ANG, Cody ML, Harlow ZT, Promponas VJ, Vallejo EE, Taylor CE. 2011. Territorial dynamics of Mexican ant-thrushes Formicarius moniliger revealed by individual recognition of their songs [J]. Ibis, 153(2): 255-268.
    Kroodsma DE. Byers BE. 1991. The function(s) of bird song [J]. Integr Comp Biol, 31(2): 318-328.
    Laiolo P, Vöegeli M, Serrano D, Tella JL. 2007. Testing acoustic versus physical marking: two complementary methods for individual-based monitoring of elusive species [J]. J Avian Biol, 38(6): 672-681.
    Lindholm A, Lindén A. 2007. Some notes on the distribution and songs of two Oriental Cuckoo taxa, Cuculus (saturatus) saturatus and Cuculus (saturatus) optatus [J]. Forktail, 23(1): 12-16.
    Marier PR. Slabbekoorn H. 2004. Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong [M]. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.
    Park SR. Park D. 2000. Song type for intrasexual interaction in the bush warbler [J]. Auk, 117(1): 228-232.
    Qin X, Wang YX, He T, Wei CT, Xia CW. 2011. Song characteristics of chestnut-lined rock bunting (Emberiza godlewskii)[J]. J Beijing Normal Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 47(4): 405-408.[覃歆, 王乙霞, 何田, 魏晨韬, 夏灿玮. 2011. 灰眉岩鹀 (Emberiza godlewskii) 的鸣唱特征分析. 北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 47(4): 405-408.]
    Qu WH, Li F, Sha JB, Zhang YM. 2011. Analyzing Japanese marsh warbler (Megalurus pryeri) song behavior in the breeding season [J]. Zool Res, 32(2): 141-149.[曲文慧, 李枫, 沙剑斌, 张玉铭. 2011. 斑背大尾莺繁殖期鸣声行为分析. 动物学研究, 32(2): 141-149]
    Rognan CB, Szewczak JM, Morrison ML. 2009. Vocal Individuality of great gray owls in the Sierra Nevada [J]. J Wildlife Manage, 73(5): 755-760.
    Sharp SP, McGowan A, Wood MJ, Hatchwell BJ. 2005. Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird [J]. Nature, 434(7037): 1127-1130.
    Soma M, Zsolt Garamszegi LZ. 2011. Rethinking birdsong evolution: meta-analysis of the relationship between song complexity and reproductive success [J]. Behav Ecol, 22(2): 363-371.
    Terry AMR, Peake TM, McGregor PK. 2005. The role of vocal individuality in conservation[J]. Front Zool, 2(1): 10.
    Wegrzyn E, Leniowski K, Osiejuk TS. 2009. Introduce yourself at the beginning-possible identification function of the initial part of the song
    in the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus [J]. Ornis Fennica, 86(2): 61-70.
    Wang AZ, Lei FM, Jia ZY. 2003. Female choice and evolution of male songs in birds[J]. Zool Res, 24(4): 305-310.[王爱真, 雷富民, 贾志云. 2003. 雌性选择与雄鸟鸣唱的进化. 动物学研究, 24(4): 305-310.]
    Wei M, Lloyd H, Zhang YY. 2011. Neighbour-stranger discrimination by yellow-bellied tit Parus venustulus: evidence for the "dear-enemy" effect [J]. J Ornithol, 152(2): 431-438.
    Wu ZK. 1986. The Avifauna of Guizhou [M]. Guiyang: Guizhou People's Publishing House.[吴至康. 1986. 贵州鸟类志. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社.]
    Xia CW. 2010. Song Structure and Variation in the Song of Cettia fortipes [D]. Thesis, Beijing Normal University, Beijing. [夏灿玮. 2010. 强脚树莺 (Cettia fortipes) 鸣唱的研究. 硕士学位论文, 北京师范大学, 北京.]
    Xia CW, Huang R, Wei CC, Nie PW, Zhang YY. 2011a. Individual identification on the basis of the songs of the Asian Stubtail (Urosphena squameiceps) [J]. Chn Birds, 2(3): 132-139.
    Xia CW, Wang YX, Qin X, He T, Zhang YY. 2011b. Spatial pattern of song sharing within Emberiza godlewskii population [J]. Chn J Ecol, 30(6):1131-1136.[夏灿玮, 王乙霞, 覃歆, 何田, 张雁云. 2011b. 灰眉岩鹀种群内鸣声的空间格局. 生态学杂志, 30(6): 1131-1136.]
    Xia CW, Xiao H, Zhang YY. 2010. Individual variation in brownish-flanked bush warbler songs[J]. Condor, 112(3): 591-595.
    Xiao H, Zhou ZX, Wang N, Zhang YY. 2008. Analyzing song characteristics of yellow-bellied tits (Parus venustulus) [J]. Zool Res, 29(3):277-284.[肖华, 周智鑫, 王宁, 张雁云. 2008. 黄腹山雀的鸣唱特征分析. 动物学研究, 29(3): 277-284.]
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Xiao-Hong LIU, Yong-Gang YAO. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers in the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis). Zoological Research, 2013, 34(E2): 13362-E.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.E02E62
    [2] QU Wen-Hui, LI Feng, SHA Jian-Bin, ZHANG Yu-Ming. Analyzing Japanese marsh warbler (Megalurus pryeri) song behavior in the breeding season. Zoological Research, 2011, 32(2): 141-149.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2011.02141
    [3] WANG Ai-Zhen. Temporal stability in song dialects of black redstarts (Phoenicurus ochruros rufiventris) in Menyuan, Qinghai Province. Zoological Research, 2010, 31(6): 617-622.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.06617
    [4] Rebekah Christensen, Sonia Kleindorfer. Bill Morphology Does Not Influence Vocal Performance in Darwin’s Small Tree Finch on Floreana Island. Zoological Research, 2009, 30(4): 423-428.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.04423
    [5] XIAO Hua, ZHOU Zhi-xin, ZHANG Yan-yun. Analyzing Song Characteristics of Yellow-bellied Tits (Parus venustulus). Zoological Research, 2008, 29(3): 277-284.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.03277
    [6] ZHU Cheng-lin, HUANG Jin-wen, ZHANG Jian-xin, DING Zhi-feng, ZHENG Xi-qun, HU Hui-j. Territorial Song of Plain Prinia (Prinia inornata). Zoological Research, 2008, 29(3): 285-290.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.03285
    [7] LIU Zhao, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing, LI Jin-xiang, LI Ning, ZHANG Reng-gong. Selection and Plant Community Characteristics of Foraging Sites for Hume’s Pheasant (Syramticus humiae) in Nanhua Part of Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve. Zoological Research, 2008, 29(6): 646-652.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.06646
    [8] LIU Jing-yuan, DU Hong, TIAN Geng-bai, YU Pin-hong, WANG Shen-wen, PEN Hong. Community Structure and Diversity Distributions of Small Mammals in Different Sample Plots in the Eastern Part of Wuling Mountains. Zoological Research, 2008, 29(6): 637-645.  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.06637
    [9] LI Wei, ZHOU Wei , *, ZHANG Xing-yong, CAO Ming, ZHANG Ren-gong. Spring Foraging Sites of Three Pheasants at Nanhua Part in Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve. Zoological Research, 2006, 27(5): 495-504.
    [10] WANG Xiao-dong, XIAO Peng, LI Dong-feng. Progress in Structure and Function of X Area in the Songbird's Forebrain. Zoological Research, 2005, 26(3): 332-336.
    [11] DING Ping, JIANG Shi-ren. Microgeographic Song Variation in the Chinese Bulbul (Pycnonotus sinenesis) in Urban Areas of Hangzhou City. Zoological Research, 2005, 26(5): 453-459.
    [12] ZENG Shao-ju, LU Kai, HUA Fang-yuan, ZHAO Wen-long, ZHANG Xin-wen, ZUO Ming-xue. Cluster Analysis of the Song Complexity and the Volumes of Song Control Nuclei among Ten Oscine Species. Zoological Research, 2004, 25(6): 522-526.
    [13] HAN Yi-cai, JIANG Shi-ren, DING Ping. Effects of Ambient Noise on the Vocal Frequency of Chinese Bulbuls,Pycnonotus sinensis in Lin'an and Fuyang City. Zoological Research, 2004, 25(2): 122-126.
    [14] JIANG Shi-ren, DING Ping. Characteristics of Time Sharing and Frequency Domain on the Morning Song of Garden Birds in Spring in Hangzhou. Zoological Research, 2003, 24(2): 132-136.
    [15] WANG Ai-zhen, LEI Fu-min, JIA Zhi-yun. Female Choice and Evolution of Male Songs in Birds. Zoological Research, 2003, 24(4): 305-310.
    [16] CHANG You-de, KANG Le. Characteristics and Function of Courtship Song of Insects and Its Ecological Significances. Zoological Research, 2002, 23(5): 419-425.
    [17] SHI Fu-Ming, YANG Pei-Lin, JIANG Shu-Nan. Studies on the Songs and Stridulatory Organs of Euconocephalus nasutus (Thunberg) and E.pallidus (Redtenbacher). Zoological Research, 2001, 22(2): 115-119.
    [18] JIANG Shi-ren, DING Ping, ZHU ge-Yang. The Comparative Studies on The Characteristics of Chinese Bulbul Songs Between Shensi Island and Hangzhou Area. Zoological Research, 1994, 15(3): 19-27.
    [19] LI Pei-xun, YU Xue-feng, LI Fang-man. Intraspecific Individual Recognition by Song in Yellow-Throated Bunting During Breeding Season. Zoological Research, 1991, 12(2): 163-168.
    [20] CHEN Ji-yao, WU Wei-zhong, CAI Huai-xin, KENG Zhen-cheng. Using A New Counting Method to Sudy the Courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Zoological Research, 1988, 9(2): 133-139.
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1199) PDF downloads(1483) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint