Volume 36 Issue 1
Jan.  2015
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Qi-Ping ZHU, Meng-Yao ZHU, Ying-Chao HU, Xue-Ya ZHANG, Guo-Hua DING, Zhi-Hua LIN. Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus). Zoological Research, 2015, 36(1): 29-33. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29
Citation: Qi-Ping ZHU, Meng-Yao ZHU, Ying-Chao HU, Xue-Ya ZHANG, Guo-Hua DING, Zhi-Hua LIN. Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus). Zoological Research, 2015, 36(1): 29-33. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29

Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus)

doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29
Funds:  This work was supported by the Open Research Fund program of Laboratory of Lishui University (2014-26-10); the Scientific Research Foundation of Ph.D. in Lishui University (QD1301); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Lishui (20110426) and the Project of Summer Work for Undergraduates in Lishui University (2014-245-23)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Guo-Hua DING
  • Received Date: 2014-09-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-10-27
  • Publish Date: 2015-01-08
  • In reptiles, habitat selection is the process whereby suitable habitat is selected that optimizes physiological functions and behavioral performance. Here, we used the brown forest skink (Sphenomorphus indicus) as a model animal and examined whether the frequency of active individuals, environmental temperature, illumination of activity area, and habitat type vary with different age classes. We surveyed the number of active individuals and measured environmental variables at Baiyunshan Mountain in Lishui, Zhejiang, China. We found no difference in the activity frequency of adult and juvenile S. indicus; the activity pattern of active individuals was bimodal. The mean environmental temperature selected by adults was higher than that selected by juveniles. The environmental temperature of active areas measured at 0900-1000 h and 1100-1200h was higher than at 1400-1500h; illumination of the active area at 1000-1200h was also higher than at 1400h-1600 h. The number of active individuals, the environmental temperature and illumination of activity areas showed pairwise positive correlation. There was a difference in habitat type between juveniles and adults whereby juveniles prefer rock habitats. We predict that active S. indicus select optimal habitats with different environmental temperatures and types to reach the physiological needs particular to their age classes.
  • 加载中
  • [1]
    Amarasekare P, Coutinho RM. 2014. Effects of temperature on intraspecific competition in ectotherms. American Naturalist, 184(3): E50-E65.
    [2]
    Angilletta MJ Jr. 2009. Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [3]
    Angilletta MJ Jr, Niewiarowski PH, Navas CA. 2002. The evolution of thermal physiology in ectotherms. Journal of Thermal Biology, 27(4): 249-268.
    [4]
    Beasley JC, Devault TL, Retamosa MI, Rhodes OE. 2007. A hierarchical analysis of habitat selection by raccoons in northern Indiana. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(4): 1125-1133.
    [5]
    Buckland S, Cole N C, Godsall B, Rodríguez-Pérez JR, Gallagher LE, Henshaw SM, Harris S. 2014. Habitat selection of the Mauritian lowland forest day gecko at multiple spatial scales: a baseline for translocation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 1: 71-79, doi:  10.1016/j.gecco.2014.06.001.
    [6]
    Castilla AM, Bauwens D. 1991. Thermal Biology, microhabitat selection, and conservation of the insular lizard Podarcis hispanica atrata. Oecologia, 85(3): 366-374.
    [7]
    Castilla AM, Van Damme R, Bauwens D. 1999. Field body temperatures, mechanisms of thermoregulation and evolution of thermal characteristics in Lacertid lizards. Natura Croatica, 8(3): 253-274.
    [8]
    Christian KA, Bedford GS. 1995. Seasonal changes in thermoregulation by the frillneck lizard, Chlamydosaurus kingii, in tropical Australia. Ecology, 76(1): 124-132.
    [9]
    Cloudsley-Thompson JL. 1961. Rhythmic Activity in Animal Physiology and Behaviour. New York: Academic Press.
    [10]
    Clusella-Trullas S, Chown SL. 2014. Lizard thermal trait variation at multiple scales: a review. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 184(1): 5-21.
    [11]
    De La Cruz SEW, Eadie JM, Miles AK, Yee J, Spragens KA, Palm EC, Takekawa JY. 2014. Resource selection and space use by sea ducks during the non-breeding season: implications for habitat conservation planning in urbanized estuaries. Biological Conservation, 169: 68-78.
    [12]
    Dochtermann NA, Jenkins SH, Swartz MJ, Hargett AC. 2012. The roles of competition and environmental heterogeneity in the maintenance of behavioral variation and covariation. Ecology, 93(6): 1330-1339.
    [13]
    Downes S, Shine R. 1998. Heat, safety or solitude? Using habitat selection experiments to identify a lizard's priorities. Animal Behaviour, 55(5): 1387-1396.
    [14]
    Hall CAS, Stanford JA, Hauer FR. 1992. The distribution and abundance of organisms as a consequence of energy balances along multiple environmental gradients. Oikos, 65(3): 377-390.
    [15]
    Hart SP, Marshall DJ. 2012. Advantages and disadvantages of interference-competitive ability and resource-use efficiency when invading established communities. Oikos, 121(3): 396-402.
    [16]
    Hertz PE, Huey RB, Stevenson R. 1993. Evaluating temperature regulation by field-active ectotherms: the fallacy of the inappropriate question. The American Naturalist, 142(5): 796-818.
    [17]
    Hódar JA, Pleguezuelos JM, Poveda JC. 2000. Habitat selection of the common chameleon (Chamaeleo chamaeleon) (L.) in an area under development in southern Spain: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 94(1): 63-68.
    [18]
    Huang QY. 1999. Sphenomorphus indicus (Gray, 1853). In: Zhao EM, Zhao KT, Zhou KY. Fauna Sinica, Reptile Vol. 2, Squamata, Lacertilia. Beijing: Science Press, 340-349. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    Huey RB. 1982. Temperature, physiology, and the ecology of reptiles. In: Gans C C, Pough FH. Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press, 25-91.
    [20]
    Irschick DJ, Macrini TE, Koruba S, Forman J. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in morphology, habitat use, behavior, and sprinting capacity in two West Indian Anolis lizards. Journal of Herpetology, 34(3): 444-451.
    [21]
    Ji X, Du WG. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in body size and head size and female reproduction in a viviparous skink, Sphenomorphus indicus. Zoological Research, 21(5): 349-354. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    Johnson DH. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61(1): 65-71.
    [23]
    Liang WB, Zhang YX, Su P, Long Q, Huang JQ. 2006. Observation on time budget of Shinisaurus crocodilurus in captivity. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 25(2): 264-266. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    Liu P, Liu ZT, Li DW, Zhao WG. 2008. Diurnal activity rhythm and time budget of Lacerta vivipara in simulated habitat. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 27(12): 2146-2152. (in Chinese)
    [25]
    Manicom C, Schwarzkopf L. 2011. Diet and prey selection of sympatric tropical skinks. Austral Ecology, 36(5): 485-496.
    [26]
    Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP. 2002. Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [27]
    Marler CA, Walsberg G, White ML, Moore M. 1995. Increased energy
    [28]
    expenditure due to increased territorial defense in male lizards after phenotypic manipulation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37(4): 225-231.
    [29]
    Mautz WJ, Nagy KA. 1987. Ontogenetic changes in diet, field metabolic rate, and water flux in the herbivorous lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis. Physiological Zoology, 60(6): 640-658.
    [30]
    Oishi T, Nagai K, Harada Y, Naruse M, Ohtani M, Kawano E, Tamotsu S. 2004. Circadian rhythms in amphibians and reptiles: ecological implications. Biological Rhythm Research, 35(1-2): 105-120.
    [31]
    Oppel S, Schaefer HM, Schmidt V, Schröder B. 2004. Habitat selection by the pale-headed brush-finch (Atlapetes pallidiceps) in southern Ecuador: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 118(1): 33-40.
    [32]
    Paulissen MA. 1987. Optimal foraging and intraspecific diet differences in the lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus. Oecologia, 71(3): 439-446.
    [33]
    Razgour O, Hanmer J, Jones G. 2011. Using multi-scale modelling to predict habitat suitability for species of conservation concern: the grey long-eared bat as a case study. Biological Conservation, 144(12): 2922-2930.
    [34]
    Shen JW, Meng FW, Zhang YP, Du WG. 2013. Field body temperature and thermal preference of the big-headed turtle Platysternon megacephalum. Current Zoology, 59(5): 626-632.
    [35]
    Shu L, Zhang QL, Qu YF, Ji X. 2010. Thermal tolerance, selected body temperature and thermal dependence of food assimilation and locomotor performance in the Qinghai toad headed lizard, Phrynocephalus vlangalii. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(8): 2036-2042. (in Chinese)
    [36]
    Stamps JA, Tanaka S. 1981. The relationship between food and social behavior in juvenile lizards. Copeia, 1981(2): 422-434.
    [37]
    Strickland MD, McDonald LL. 2006. Introduction to the special section on resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70(2): 321-323.
    [38]
    Tang XL, Yue F, He JZ, Wang NB, Ma M, Mo JR, Chen Q. 2013. Ontogenetic and sexual differences of thermal biology and locomotor performance in a lacertid lizard, Eremias multiocellata. Zoology, 116(6): 331-335.
    [39]
    Thomas DL, Taylor EJ. 1990. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management, 54(2): 322-330.
    [40]
    Vermunt A, Hare KM, Besson AA. 2014. Unusual change in activity pattern at cool temperature in a reptile (Sphenodon punctatus). Journal of Thermal Biology, 42: 40-45.
    [41]
    Wang PC. 1964. Ecology of four lizards in Hangzhou (1): distribution, activity rhythm and food habits. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 6(2): 70-76. (in Chinese)
    [42]
    Wasko DK, Sasa M. 2012. Food resources influence spatial ecology, habitat selection, and foraging behavior in an ambush-hunting snake (Viperidae: Bothrops asper): an experimental study. Zoology, 115(3): 179-187.
    [43]
    Webb J. 1996. Ecology of A Threatened Snake Species, Hoplocephalus bungaroides (Elapidae). Ph. D. thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.
    [44]
    Wen CY, Zou PZ. 2002. Preliminary studies on population ecology and diet of Eumeces chinensis in the north of Guangdong province. Journal of Guangzhou University(Natural Science Edition), 1(3): 19-22. (in Chinese)
    [45]
    Xu XF, Ji X. 2006. Ontogenetic shifts in thermal tolerance, selected body temperature and thermal dependence of food assimilation and locomotor performance in a lacertid lizard, Eremias brenchleyi. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 143(1): 118-124.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(791) PDF downloads(1550) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus)

doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29
Funds:  This work was supported by the Open Research Fund program of Laboratory of Lishui University (2014-26-10); the Scientific Research Foundation of Ph.D. in Lishui University (QD1301); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Lishui (20110426) and the Project of Summer Work for Undergraduates in Lishui University (2014-245-23)
    Corresponding author: Guo-Hua DING

Abstract: In reptiles, habitat selection is the process whereby suitable habitat is selected that optimizes physiological functions and behavioral performance. Here, we used the brown forest skink (Sphenomorphus indicus) as a model animal and examined whether the frequency of active individuals, environmental temperature, illumination of activity area, and habitat type vary with different age classes. We surveyed the number of active individuals and measured environmental variables at Baiyunshan Mountain in Lishui, Zhejiang, China. We found no difference in the activity frequency of adult and juvenile S. indicus; the activity pattern of active individuals was bimodal. The mean environmental temperature selected by adults was higher than that selected by juveniles. The environmental temperature of active areas measured at 0900-1000 h and 1100-1200h was higher than at 1400-1500h; illumination of the active area at 1000-1200h was also higher than at 1400h-1600 h. The number of active individuals, the environmental temperature and illumination of activity areas showed pairwise positive correlation. There was a difference in habitat type between juveniles and adults whereby juveniles prefer rock habitats. We predict that active S. indicus select optimal habitats with different environmental temperatures and types to reach the physiological needs particular to their age classes.

Qi-Ping ZHU, Meng-Yao ZHU, Ying-Chao HU, Xue-Ya ZHANG, Guo-Hua DING, Zhi-Hua LIN. Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus). Zoological Research, 2015, 36(1): 29-33. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29
Citation: Qi-Ping ZHU, Meng-Yao ZHU, Ying-Chao HU, Xue-Ya ZHANG, Guo-Hua DING, Zhi-Hua LIN. Age-related habitat selection by brown forest skinks (Sphenomorphus indicus). Zoological Research, 2015, 36(1): 29-33. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2015.1.29
Reference (45)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return