• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
赵亚辉, 张春光. 2013: 阿庐金线鲃(Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005)物种有效性及其重新描述. 动物学研究, 34(4): 374-378. DOI: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.4.0374
引用本文: 赵亚辉, 张春光. 2013: 阿庐金线鲃(Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005)物种有效性及其重新描述. 动物学研究, 34(4): 374-378. DOI: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.4.0374
Ya-Hui ZHAO, Chun-Guang ZHANG. 2013. Validation and re-description of Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005 (Cypriniforms: Cyprinidae). Zoological Research, 34(4): 374-378. DOI: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.4.0374
Citation: Ya-Hui ZHAO, Chun-Guang ZHANG. 2013. Validation and re-description of Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005 (Cypriniforms: Cyprinidae). Zoological Research, 34(4): 374-378. DOI: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.4.0374

阿庐金线鲃(Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005)物种有效性及其重新描述

Validation and re-description of Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005 (Cypriniforms: Cyprinidae)

  • 摘要: 阿庐金线鲃(Sinocyclocheilus aluensis Li et Xiao, 2005)曾为狭孔金线鲃(S. angustiporus Zheng et Xie, 1985)的同物异名。该文在比对采自云南泸西县城郊龙潭的金线鲃标本和狭孔金线鲃模式标本后发现, 两者间存在明显且稳定的形态差异, 因此, 阿庐金线鲃应为有效种。阿庐金线鲃背鳍起点位于腹鳍起点垂直线之后, 可与狭孔金线鲃(背鳍起点与腹鳍起点正相对或稍前)相区别, 且前者眼径及眼球径较小, 而眼间距较宽(阿庐金线鲃分别为头长的22.4%~29.7%、16.0%~23.6%及21.0%~32.3%, 狭孔金线鲃分别为头长的26.4%~38.9%、21.3%~29.0%及19.7%~22.6%)。

     

    Abstract: Sinocyclocheilus aluensis was previously synonymized with S. angustiporus, but through the comparison of the specimens collected from Luxi County (type locality of S. aluensis) and type specimens of S. angustiporus, we identified several clear and stable characteristics to distinguish them. These findings suggest that S. aluensis should be considered as a valid species, as it can be distinguished from S. angustiporus by the position of the dorsal-fin insertion (posterior to vs. opposite to the pelvic-fin insertion), eye (22.4%-29.7% vs. 26.4%-38.9%, percentage of head length), eye-ball diameter (16.0%-23.6% vs. 21.3%-29.0%), and interorbital width (21.0%-32.3% vs. 19.7%-22.6%).

     

/

返回文章
返回